Was the Indian Removal Act justified or unfair?

No, the Indian Removal act isn’t justified because there was no law stating that the White Americans can move the Native Americans further west. The White Americans went against the Constitution. … It just not fair because that was their land and the White Americans couldn’t just move them off their own land.

Why was Indian removal Unfair?

There were two main reasons the Indian Removal Act was wrong. The first reason is that the 5th amendment states, “No person shall be…deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…” Taking the Native Americans land with the Indian Removal Act violates one of the amendments.

Why was the Indian Removal Act fair?

President Jackson told Congress that he felt the act was fair because a fair exchange of land was being granted and because the General Government proposed to pay the whole expense of the red man’s removal and settlement…

THIS IS FUN:  How many power plants are there in India?

What act did they justify the forced removal of Native Americans?

The Indian Removal Act was signed into law on May 28, 1830, by United States President Andrew Jackson.

Indian Removal Act.

Enacted by the 21st United States Congress
Citations
Public law Pub.L. 21–148
Statutes at Large 4 Stat. 411
Legislative history

Was the US justified in the Trail of Tears?

It was morally wrong because of the loss of life. Somewhere between one-quarter and one-third of the Cherokee Nation was lost as a result of the Trail of Tears. It was morally wrong because the arguments used to justify the move were based on falsehood.

What were the arguments against the Indian Removal Act?

Jackson warned the tribes that if they failed to move, they would lose their independence and fall under state laws. Jackson backed an Indian removal bill in Congress. Members of Congress like Davy Crockett argued that Jackson violated the Constitution by refusing to enforce treaties that guaranteed Indian land rights.

What did the Indian Removal Act do?

The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy.

What argument did Andrew Jackson used to persuade people that the Indian Removal Act was a good decision?

Which argument did Andrew Jackson use to persuade people that the Indian Removal Act was a good decision? Removing American Indians will alow white settlers to become wealthier. What was the main purpose of Andrew Jackson’s message in “On Indian Removal”?

THIS IS FUN:  Which of the following events marked the end of the Indian war?

What were some of the effects of the Indian Removal Act?

It freed more than 25 million acres of fertile, lucrative farmland to mostly white settlement in Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, and Arkansas.

What were the consequences of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?

Intrusions of land-hungry settlers, treaties with the U.S., and the Indian Removal Act (1830) resulted in the forced removal and migration of many eastern Indian nations to lands west of the Mississippi.

Who was against the Indian Removal Act?

President Andrew Jackson signed the measure into law on May 28, 1830. 3. The legendary frontiersman and Tennessee congressman Davy Crockett opposed the Indian Removal Act, declaring that his decision would “not make me ashamed in the Day of Judgment.”

What was wrong with the Trail of Tears?

Severe exposure, starvation and disease ravaged tribes during their forced migration to present-day Oklahoma. … As many as 4,000 died of disease, starvation and exposure during their detention and forced migration through nine states that became known as the “Trail of Tears.”

Why is the forced removal referred to as the Trail of Tears?

The Cherokee people called this journey the “Trail of Tears,” because of its devastating effects. The migrants faced hunger, disease, and exhaustion on the forced march. Over 4,000 out of 15,000 of the Cherokees died. … It commemorates the suffering of the Cherokee people under forced removal.

How could the Trail of Tears been avoided?

as well as trade with the Indians.

THIS IS FUN:  What is the average temperature of India in June?

This tragedy could have been prevented by Andrew Jackson rescinded his pride and pressed for fixing the problems revolving Indians and the settlers rather than removing, displacing, and murdering them.