What were some arguments against the Indian Removal Act?

Why was the Indian Removal Act unfair?

There were two main reasons the Indian Removal Act was wrong. The first reason is that the 5th amendment states, “No person shall be…deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…” Taking the Native Americans land with the Indian Removal Act violates one of the amendments.

What opposition was there to the Indian Removal Act?

The opponents of Indian Removal included Chief John Ross of the Cherokee, whose homeland was surrounded by the states of Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, and North Carolina, Jeremiah Evarts, of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, and Peleg Sprague, Senator from Maine.

What were the negative effects of the Indian Removal Act?

The most significant impact of them all was said to be the Trail of Tears. This remorseless event led to an extravagant number of deaths to the Indians. Along with this deadly removal process, the Removal Act led to poor living conditions for the Native Americans.

THIS IS FUN:  Quick Answer: What do you understand by joint Hindu family business?

What was the argument for the removal of the Native Americans?

Most white Americans thought that the United States would never extend beyond the Mississippi. Removal would save Indian people from the depredations of whites, and would resettle them in an area where they could govern themselves in peace.

Who opposed the Indian Removal Act of 1830?

The bill was very controversial and the debate in Congress was fierce, with opposition in the Senate lead by Theodore Frelinghuysen, who gave a 6-hour speech against the bill at one point. Daniel Webster, Henry Clay, and David Crockett, among many other legislators, also opposed it.

What were the major economic political and social arguments for and against Indian removal?

The major arguments for indian removal were that due to an increase in cotton production because of the newly invented cotton gin farmers needed more land for their plantations which put pressure on Indian land, another argument for Indian removal was that most Americans felt that they were superior to the Indians due …

Was the Indian Removal Act justified or unfair?

No, the Indian Removal act isn’t justified because there was no law stating that the White Americans can move the Native Americans further west. The White Americans went against the Constitution.

Who opposed the Trail of Tears?

Opposition to the removal was led by Chief John Ross, a mixed-blood of Scottish and one-eighth Cherokee descent.

What were the consequences of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?

Intrusions of land-hungry settlers, treaties with the U.S., and the Indian Removal Act (1830) resulted in the forced removal and migration of many eastern Indian nations to lands west of the Mississippi.

THIS IS FUN:  Who became the first viceroy of India in 1858?

What are some possible effects that the Indian Removal Act might have on Native Americans already living in the West?

What are some possible effects that the Indian Removal Act might have on Native Americans already living in the West? The Indians may fight for their land and their would be war. What was the Trail of Tears? The Cherokee’s 800-mile forced march to Indian Territory from Georgia.

What were the consequences of the Trail of Tears?

The Cherokee people called this journey the “Trail of Tears,” because of its devastating effects. The migrants faced hunger, disease, and exhaustion on the forced march. Over 4,000 out of 15,000 of the Cherokees died.

How did the Indian Removal Act end?

The Cherokee worked together to stop this relocation, but were unsuccessful; they were eventually forcibly removed by the United States government in a march to the west that later became known as the Trail of Tears, which has been described as an act of genocide, because many died during the removals.

How did the Indian Removal Act affect slavery?

Nakia Parker: While Indian removal expands the growth of slavery in the South, it also expands slavery westward because indigenous people who enslaved African-Americans could bring enslaved people to their new home in Indian territory.